After last week’s infamous food fight and the social media explosion that went along with it, the halls are buzzing with talk of students being punished for what was written in their tweets.
Can you be punished for your tweets? Yes. Regardless of whether you are on school WIFI, a school computer or your own personal cell phone, you can be punished by the school if a disruption is caused.
According to the Student Handbook, “Students are prohibited from possessing, sending, forwarding, posting, accessing, or displaying electronic messages that are abusive, obscene, sexually oriented, threatening, harassing, damaging to another’s reputation, or illegal. This prohibition also applies to conduct off school property, whether the equipment used to send such messages is district-owned or personally owned, if it results in a substantial disruption to the educational environment.”
Disruptive is the exact word that describes Twitter in the aftermath of the food fight. Students were able to organize a “Free Jeremy” chant via Twitter. Jeremy Burno, a senior, was one of the students who received the most immediate punishment for the food fight.
“I think it’s stupid that they will send you home for something that is said on Twitter because honestly that just takes away more class time for you,” senior Jace Caton said. “I got sent home because of my tweets and tweeting like “Free Jeremy” and for ‘starting a riot that disrupted the school environment’. Students are on their phones in class anyways so I don’t think the fact that people were tweeting more than usual really mattered.”
The “riot” mentioned, was a gathering of students outside the principals offices during passing period where students began chanting “Free Jeremy” (watch the video above).
While students don’t believe that Twitter was a disruption, administrators do.
“We generally are not monitoring social media however if like in the instance of where we had the food fight and then people were talking back and forth about it and if it’s something that’s going to impact what’s going on in the classroom and disrupt the classroom and take kids minds off of what’s going on in class then we’ll evaluate that and make decisions based on that,” principal Gavan Goodrich said. “Our job is to maintain a good educational environment and when social media gets in the way of a quality educational environment then we have to evaluate whether we have to step in or not.”
While rumors are buzzing and the school does have the authority to press charges and turn the food fight/twitter drama into a legal matter, the school is not planning on taking any extreme actions.
“I don’t see any legal repercussions. There are going to be consequences for those involved but I don’t see it going beyond that. I think that it’s always part of the discussion whenever you have something that’s chaotic in a public place,” Goodrich said. “If somebody was hurt and there was danger involved and if you look at the video tape you see bottles of gatorade hitting kids in the head and if it were to have hit someone in the head and we had evidence of who did it then certainly that person would be held responsible.”
Students’ Twitters, Facebooks, Instagrams and any other social network accounts can be monitored by the school. If the school or administrators feel like a students actions on social networks are posing a threat or distraction to the learning environment, they have the authority to take action.
“There is always a possibility of legal action and we’re lucky that we didn’t have that but it’s always out there and always available, but in this case I don’t see any of that happening,” Goodrich said.
Anonymous • Feb 11, 2013 at 12:38 pm
The comments say speak your mind yet we are censored.
Anonymous • Feb 6, 2013 at 12:08 pm
Lovejoy is the closest thing to Fascism I have seen in my entire life.
Kris Johannsen • Feb 8, 2013 at 3:25 pm
Definition from dictionary.com:
a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
Schools do have some of these tendencies, so do team sports BTW not too mention the Military.Nuff said.
However without regimentation in school how are educators supposed to educate a large number of youthful, hormone driven students (excitable)?
Would be like trying to lasso a fish I would think.. good luck with that…
Yes sometimes mistakes are made since administrators and teachers are typically human.
Lovejoy has rules but Fascism not really.
If you want to protest the free jeremy thing in Lovejoy then wear black armbands to school if you are that determined. U.S. Supreme Court upheld that in the 60’s as an acceptable non violent and non-disruptive form of protest.
Seems like trashing the cafeteria could well warrant a short suspension to me tho. Sorry
Anonymous • Feb 6, 2013 at 12:05 pm
Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend people.
Brad Thor
Anonymous • Feb 6, 2013 at 12:04 pm
I begin to feel like most Americans don’t understand the First Amendment, don’t understand the idea of freedom of speech, and don’t understand that it’s the responsibility of the citizen to speak out.
Roger Ebert
Anonymous • Feb 6, 2013 at 11:59 am
Ok let me just say this: On a drug meeting article on this website, I posted a comment that said sarcastically, “Yeah, cause weed kills brain cells.” and the comment never made it public. Internet censorship is bad and censorship in general is even worse. Ignorance is bliss and the truth may hurt but just because I post a comment saying weed kills brain cells with intent on mocking the drug presentation does not mean that Red Ledger Admins should not allow my voice to be heard.
“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” —- George Washington
Ginger Hervey- Editor-in-chief • Feb 6, 2013 at 11:19 pm
We do not censor comments to inhibit anybody’s freedom of speech. As journalists, of course we understand that everyone has a right to be heard. Not approving your comment was not an attempt to repress your voice. However, we have a comment policy to which we adhere with any questionable comments. We do not approve comments if we find them disrespectful or if they could provoke an unnecessary argument that has nothing to do with the article. If you would like to see our full comment policy, it can be found here: https://www.theredledger.net/about-us/policies/
Kris Johannsen • Feb 6, 2013 at 9:53 am
I think the administration is walking a slippery slope. 1st Amendment not withstanding tweeting while not at school except under dire circumstances should be allowed.
This quote: if it’s something that’s going to impact what’s going on in the classroom and disrupt the classroom and take kids minds off of what’s going on in class then we’ll evaluate that and make decisions based on that. principal Gavan Goodrich said
I guess the school should outlaw the SuperBowl, Cowboys, Rangers most Lovejoy Sports including VolleyBall and Football, nice looking girls, handsome guys and hormones because they would all pass that criteria as possibly disrupting and taking mind off school work.
I think some folks need to lighten up.
Anonymous • Feb 6, 2013 at 1:06 pm
PREACH!!!!!!
Ben Brewer • Feb 5, 2013 at 11:21 pm
#FREEJEREMY
Anonymous • Feb 5, 2013 at 1:52 pm
This is probably why no one wants to comment on the red ledger.
Anonymous • Feb 6, 2013 at 12:15 pm
I have posted some controversial but not offensive comments and absolutely none of them have made it public.
Ginger Hervey- Editor-in-chief • Feb 6, 2013 at 11:23 pm
We have a comment policy that we adhere to with questionable comments. If your comment was not approved, it was for one of the reasons listed in this policy: https://www.theredledger.net/about-us/policies/
If you have questions about why a specific comment was not approved, please feel free to email me at [email protected] and I will tell you what our rationale was. If, on review, we find it publishable, we will approve it. Thank you for reading!