Bond propositions pass

Bond propositions pass

Michelle Stoddart, Staff Reporter

The second time was a charm for the school district as both bond propositions passed, meaning the district will have the necessary financing to make improvements and additions throughout the district. Presented as one $75 million bond in November 2013, voters rejected that measure by 21 votes. However, it was a different outcome in the May 10 election as both propositions passed by hundreds of votes.

 

The bond propositions passed, meaning development should be expected on campus facilities.
The bond propositions passed, meaning development should be expected on campus facilities.

Proposition 1:

For            2140

Against     1626

 

Proposition 2:

For            2017

Against     1750

 

In addition to the bond propositions, two positions with the Board of Trustees were on the ballot with both incumbents re-elected.

Position 4:

Julie James      1986

Tom Redman       1300

 

Position 5:

Matt Gournay            2229

Axel de la Soujeole       926

 

From an extension of B-Hall to an above ground training pool, the anticipated expansions are numerous and require extensive planning.

“Now that the bond has passed, the administration will move into the develop of a timeline and begin design and development work that must be completed prior to the creation of construction documents,” district superintendent Ted Moore said.